How to handle Wrapper(?) Dlls

Henri Verbeet hverbeet at
Mon Jul 26 09:07:32 CDT 2010

On 26 July 2010 15:58, Uwe Bonnes
<bon at> wrote:
> Wrapper DLLs, where possible, are much more favorable. They don't require
> server calls for each function call.
I'd imagine proper USB support wouldn't either. That said, I don't
know for sure if that's the real reason either, it could also be a
specific issue with that patch, or a more general consideration like
"Let's not add wrappers for every possible Linux library".

More information about the wine-devel mailing list