[PATCH 4/4] winecfg: Cosmetic improvements to the about panel

Alexandre Julliard julliard at winehq.org
Tue Jun 1 15:39:23 CDT 2010

Joel Holdsworth <joel at airwebreathe.org.uk> writes:

> Are you sure? I really do think using PNGs is preferable. The PNG is
> 22.8kB, whereas a BMP would be 237.2kB - over 10x larger! If I use a
> BMP, it will make the winecfg executable bloat up 25%.
> By contrast importing GDI+ or WIC seems to me like a small price to pay.

We can add support for PNG icons after 1.2. Adding more dependencies to
winecfg is much more risky than a bloated icon.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org

More information about the wine-devel mailing list