jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net
Sun Jun 13 12:09:43 CDT 2010
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wylda at volny.cz wrote:
>> Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
>> 340 regressions<-- release announcement
>> 356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week
>> 339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
>> 322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2)
>> 325 regressions<-- release announcement + 4weeks
>> 326 regressions<-- release announcement + 5weeks(rc3)
>> List of fixed bugs on rc3 release was long and impressive. Unfortunately
>> for regressions there is a stagnation.
> Regression bugs do get fixed too but "new" regressions are added at
> the same rate. A lot of the of the newly reported regressions happened
> before 1.2-rc1; it looks like people are using the release candidates
> to test their favorite app with and report the regression they find.
> And that is good; just screws up the statistics ;)
I'll second this as there have been "My application works with Wine
1.0.1, but does not with Wine-1.2-rc(x)' messages in Wine Users. Of
course, this leads to bug reports.
I'll start looking at regressions as soon as I can.
More information about the wine-devel