Purist keyword?

Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry at codeweavers.com
Sat Oct 30 10:50:36 CDT 2010

Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote:

> I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled
> native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these
> bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?

Personally I don't see the point. The less keywords is the better IMO. Why not
clarify the problem in the subject, like "xxx doesn't install without native
yyy.dll" ?


More information about the wine-devel mailing list