[PATCH 2/6] d3dcompiler: Implement D3DGetBlobPart().
kgbricola at web.de
Mon Sep 20 13:42:00 CDT 2010
Am 20.09.2010 20:05, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> But if it turns out to really be much nicer you could certainly
> introduce a dxbc_remove_section() function, but I doubt it. In the
> current patch it's simply dead code though. Somewhat related, do you
> happen to know if section tags need to be unique within a DXBC? I'd
> imagine the DXBC format doesn't restrict that, though specific
> functions may have additional constraints on what is considered a
> valid input DXBC.
I have no idea if section codes need to be unique, but I couldn't get a
DXBC with not unique items (beside the ones in the effect but which use
several shaders as part DXBCs - I wouldn't count that as a DXBC it is
more the FX10). I have to admit I haven't tried that specifically.
More information about the wine-devel