kernel32/tests: remove win9x hacks (try 2)
saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Thu Feb 24 09:42:50 CST 2011
* On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> The win9x support makes the tests less strict, by allowing additional
> behaviors, and that only when running on Windows.
Is that a problem?
> Running them on Wine is pointless since these code paths are never
I may be missing the point, but Wine uses broken() function already.
Similar function, eg. dead_9x(), could be easily created to check for such
> > And does this mean that Windows 3.1 (and DOS?) tests aren't welcome
> > now?
> As part of the winetest infrastructure, they are not welcome, and never
> have been.
I have at least one Win16 app which behaves differently on Win16, on XP
and on Wine [*].
What's the right way to get it running OK on Wine then (without
appropriate Win16API tests) ?
More information about the wine-devel