[PATCH 1/3] winemenubuilder: Icon heights/widths of 0 mean 256, for Vista icons.
damjan.jov at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 02:41:40 CST 2011
The 256x256 pixel icons are designed to be viewed in that size. They
can, and often do, contain a different picture to the smaller icons.
When you scale them down to a smaller size, they look bad. On MacOS
that may not matter since multiple icon sizes are written and the best
is chosen, but on freedesktops we only write 1 icon size at the
moment, and then it gets scaled to something like 64x64, so it really
does make a difference.
Install eMule and see its icons on Gnome as an example.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Ken Thomases <ken at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> The existing code would always prefer a smaller icon because it was
> misinterpreting 256x256 icons as 0x0.
> programs/winemenubuilder/winemenubuilder.c | 32 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
More information about the wine-devel