[PATCH 2/8] ntdll: rework the handling of server ioctls a little bit to avoid a crash with later patches

Alexandre Julliard julliard at winehq.org
Fri Jul 29 06:34:33 CDT 2011


Bernhard Loos <bernhardloos at googlemail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
>> Bernhard Loos <bernhardloos at googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> @@ -1273,10 +1282,16 @@ static NTSTATUS server_ioctl_file( HANDLE handle, HANDLE event,
>>>
>>>      if (wait_handle)
>>>      {
>>> -        NtWaitForSingleObject( wait_handle, (options & FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT), NULL );
>>> -        status = io->u.Status;
>>> +        status = NtWaitForSingleObject( wait_handle, (options & FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT), NULL );
>>> +        if (status == STATUS_USER_APC)
>>> +        {
>>> +            async->interrupted = TRUE;
>>> +            status = STATUS_CANCELLED; /* not really, the ioctl completes and event and the handle
>>> +                                          itself get signaled */
>>> +        }
>>
>> This looks wrong. You can't claim it was cancelled if it's still
>> running.
>>
>> --
>> Alexandre Julliard
>> julliard at winehq.org
>>
>
> I'm not really sure, what to do at this point. I can't exactly return
> ERROR_SUCCESS because the operation is not completed yet. At best, I
> can reenter the wait, but this will break in places, where the caller
> depends on DeviceIoControl returning in case of a scheduled user apc.

If the operation is supposed to be cancelled, then it should be
cancelled properly. This probably needs to be done server-side.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org



More information about the wine-devel mailing list