Ubuntu's next release and raising hard ulimit on ubuntu
Paul Chitescu
paulc at voip.null.ro
Fri Mar 25 09:38:09 CDT 2011
On Friday 25 March 2011 03:26:25 pm Dan Kegel wrote:
> Scott, correct me if I'm wrong, but does Natty still have the
> hard limit of 1024 files open per process?
> If so, should be ask people to go vote for
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663090
> ?
>
> Getting that limit raised might avoid increasing numbers of
> support requests from users who can't figure out why Wine can't run their
> p2p downloader ( http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25015 ).
This is not an Ubuntu limitation but rather of the (g)libc API implementation.
At least on glibc it is possible to increase the FD_SETSIZE at build time.
Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. No need for header patching.
http://yate.null.ro/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=yate&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fengine%2FSocket.cpp
Caveat: FD_... operations take longer if FD_SETSIZE is increased.
On all relevant platforms it is possible to check if a fd is above the limit.
The application code must do so.
Best is to internally replace select() with poll() on platforms that support
it.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list