[PATCH] server: if a debugger is attached to a process, child processes shouldn't get debugged (resend)
bernhardloos at googlemail.com
Sun Oct 9 16:19:50 CDT 2011
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, David Laight <david at l8s.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:32:27PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:44:24AM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>> > Bernhard Loos <bernhardloos at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > > + int debug_childs:1; /* also debug all child processes */
>> > 'debug_children' would be a better name.
>> unsigned int foo:1;
>> please. (int foo:1 works, but is semidefined only ;)
> Why the bitfield anyway?
> Unless you are allocating a lot of copies of the structure
> it is likely to generate more code than the saved memory.
Actually, the generated code is pretty much exactly the same size or
even smaller for one function. Also, it makes it clear that this is a
> David Laight: david at l8s.co.uk
More information about the wine-devel