dank at kegel.com
Thu Sep 1 11:12:43 CDT 2011
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 13:04:34 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> Did the tests start passing on fglrx then?
> As far as I know they don't. But do they have to?
> If I remember correctly Dan's previous patchwatcher scripts kept track of
> tests that were failing, so they didn't require a fully successful test run.
> The important thing was that the tests succeeded or failed reliably.
> The new setup looks much less sophisticated in that regard
Right - I have not yet forward ported the code that tracks
known failures. It hasn't been needed so far -- I've gotten away
with a simple blacklist -- but once I start doing things like valgrinding,
checking compiler warnings, or running on ATI I'll probably need to
bring it back.
More information about the wine-devel