Marking test cases as flaky?

Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Mon Sep 12 02:49:34 CDT 2011

Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger at> writes:

> On Saturday 10 September 2011 21:56:26 Dan Kegel wrote:
>> Might want to define the new form as ok2_ or something
>> so we can defer changing the explicit uses of ok_().
> I dislike the idea, it has the feeling of legacy cruft. Either way it is a 
> fairly minor point - the main change that needs debating is whether we should 
> print the function name or not.

We don't want that by default, especially since __FUNCTION__ is not
portable. If you have cases where you get frequent failures that are
hard to debug, you can always print extra info in the ok message.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list