Marking test cases as flaky?

[Alexandre Julliard]

Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger at gmx.at> writes:

> On Saturday 10 September 2011 21:56:26 Dan Kegel wrote:
>> Might want to define the new form as ok2_ or something
>> so we can defer changing the explicit uses of ok_().
> I dislike the idea, it has the feeling of legacy cruft. Either way it is a 
> fairly minor point - the main change that needs debating is whether we should 
> print the function name or not.

We don't want that by default, especially since __FUNCTION__ is not
portable. If you have cases where you get frequent failures that are
hard to debug, you can always print extra info in the ok message.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org