RFC: Highlighting Fall-throughs

[Andrew Talbot]

Andrew Talbot wrote:

> Alex Bradbury wrote:
> 
>> Marking fall through cases sounds reasonable on the face of it to me.
>> I question the necessity of adding 'unaudited' comments though. I'd
>> imagine lint or one of the more sophisticated static analysis tools
>> could pretty easily give you a list of cases with fall-through without
>> a comment marking it as intentional.
>> 
>> Alex
> 

On further reflection, I think you are right. The single comment is enough 
on its own.

Thanks, Alex.

-- 
Andy.