new d3d9/device.ok test always fails here, but not a regression?
Saulius Krasuckas
saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Tue Jan 3 01:10:03 CST 2012
* On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> If an app stops working because some missing feature is added to an
> existing DLL, it should not be tagged as a regression even though it is
> from the app's point of view, right?
> (Thinking of the installers for Photoshop CS3 and Visual Studio 2005.)
> I wonder if we need a separate keyword for that, like 'appregression'.
I would call it 'newfeature' or even 'weaknewfeature' to avoid similarity
between sound of 'regression' and 'appregression'.
S.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list