new d3d9/device.ok test always fails here, but not a regression?

[Austin English]

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 01:10, Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2 at ar.fi.lt> wrote:
> * On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> If an app stops working because some missing feature is added to an
>> existing DLL, it should not be tagged as a regression even though it is
>> from the app's point of view, right?
>> (Thinking of the installers for Photoshop CS3 and Visual Studio 2005.)
>> I wonder if we need a separate keyword for that, like 'appregression'.
>
> I would call it 'newfeature' or even 'weaknewfeature' to avoid similarity
> between sound of 'regression' and 'appregression'.

I don't think it's a common enough occurrence to warrant a keyword.

-- 
-Austin