d3dx9_36/tests: Fix sizeof to be more portable (coverity)

André Hentschel nerv at dawncrow.de
Tue Oct 23 20:30:46 CDT 2012

Am 24.10.2012 02:32, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 24 October 2012 02:05, André Hentschel <nerv at dawncrow.de> wrote:
>>          face_remap = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY,
>> -                               tc[i].num_faces*sizeof(face_remap));
>> +                               tc[i].num_faces*sizeof(DWORD*));
> I'm don't know what Coverity actually says about this, but this looks
> just as wrong to me. It's probably supposed to be
> "sizeof(*face_remap)".

That's actually what Coverity suggested, but i thought i've seen more sizeofs of this kind.


Best Regards, André Hentschel

More information about the wine-devel mailing list