[PATCH] netstat: Clarify labels in UDP statistics.
Lauri Kenttä
lauri.kentta at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 12:56:15 CST 2013
On 2013-02-09 23:15, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> "Invalid Datagrams" is too vague. It could mean datagrams sent or
> received.
I think it's pretty obvious. Nobody should send invalid datagrams
anyway, especially not using any actual datagram functions, so it would
be ridiculous to have a counter for it.
On 2013-02-09 23:15, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> If you want to disambiguate/explain, use message contexts as explained
> in http://wiki.winehq.org/Translating
This isn't (only) a translation ambiguity issue, this is about the
original texts, especially "No Ports".
Or are you trying to suggest that I add #msgctxt#udp_received_stats# to
that "Invalid Datagrams"?
--
Lauri Kenttä
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list