Why complain about X1R5G5B5?
fgouget at codeweavers.com
Sun Feb 24 10:43:14 CST 2013
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 23 February 2013 17:20, Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Personally, I suspect the test is just overly restrictive.
> Also, just to clarify something, initially on IRC I was under the
> impression the driver *only* exposed X1R5G5B5, i.e. instead of
> X8R8G8B8, while clearly supporting 32 bpp display modes.
Yes, that's probably my fault as that's what I believed too initially.
But I have since run tests to list all the supported format and QXL
exposes both X1R5G5B5 and X8R8G8B8:
Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com>
More information about the wine-devel