Why complain about X1R5G5B5?

[Francois Gouget]

On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Henri Verbeet wrote:

> On 23 February 2013 17:20, Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Personally, I suspect the test is just overly restrictive.
> 
> Also, just to clarify something, initially on IRC I was under the
> impression the driver *only* exposed X1R5G5B5, i.e. instead of
> X8R8G8B8, while clearly supporting 32 bpp display modes.

Yes, that's probably my fault as that's what I believed too initially. 
But I have since run tests to list all the supported format and QXL 
exposes both X1R5G5B5 and X8R8G8B8:

http://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=243&log_103=1#k103

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com>