msvcrt: remove hack

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Christian Costa <titan.costa at gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>> and no modern gcc/other compiler that I can find cares.
> >>> It was probably added because of a tool that warned of the unused
> >>> parameter ... So it all goes in circles. ;)
> >>>
> >>> Ciao, Marcus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> So what about action = NULL instead?
> > A checker tool should be instructed to ignore that kind of a warning
> > instead. There are many legitimate cases when a function doesn't use
> > all of its parameters, in that cases there is no need to take any
> > special action to silence a warning IMHO.
> >
> There is also __attribute__((unused_parameter)) but it's gcc specific.

How is that better than 'unused = unused'? And it's even more typing...

-- 
Dmitry.