[PATCH 1/4] ntdll: Implement retrieving DOS attributes in NtQueryInformationFile (try 2).

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Erich E. Hoover" <erich.e.hoover at gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Alexandre Julliard
> <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
>> "Erich E. Hoover" <erich.e.hoover at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> ...
>> Depending on the size of the functions, copying them into the server may
>> be preferable. In any case it would be a good idea to submit the rest of
>> the patches so we can see where this is going.
>
> For the rest of the DOS Attributes features there's only a couple more
> relevant patches (
> https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/ntdll-DOS_Attributes
> ):
> Mac OS X)
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/master/patches/ntdll-DOS_Attributes/0005-libport-Add-support-for-Mac-OS-X-style-extended-attr.patch
> FreeBSD)
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/master/patches/ntdll-DOS_Attributes/0006-libport-Add-support-for-FreeBSD-style-extended-attri.patch
>
> For the security descriptor patches we have a couple separate
> patchsets toward the full implementation (8 more patches):
> Bug #33576) storage/retrieval of SDs/ACLs (6 patches):
> https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/server-Stored_ACLs
> Bug #34406) inheritance of SDs/ACLs (2 patches):
> https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/server-Inherited_ACLs
>
> If you prefer i can submit them to wine-patches, but i figured that
> people probably don't want the spam.

Submitting them would be better, reading patches in a browser isn't very
convenient. But from a quick look it seems that many parts will need
more work, so I don't think you should be defining libport functions at
this point.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org