usp10: Use BOOL type where appropriate

[Frédéric Delanoy]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/26/2014 14:11, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/26/2014 11:12, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> cf.
>>>>
>>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd374096%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>>>> ---
>>>>    dlls/usp10/opentype.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>>    dlls/usp10/shape.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>>    dlls/usp10/usp10.c    | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>>>    3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/dlls/usp10/opentype.c b/dlls/usp10/opentype.c
>>>> index 166d823..5b3bdc7 100644
>>>> --- a/dlls/usp10/opentype.c
>>>> +++ b/dlls/usp10/opentype.c
>>>> @@ -645,34 +645,34 @@ void OpenType_GDEF_UpdateGlyphProps(ScriptCache
>>>> *psc, const WORD *pwGlyphs, cons
>>>>            {
>>>>                case 0:
>>>>                case BaseGlyph:
>>>> -                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fClusterStart = 1;
>>>> -                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fDiacritic = 0;
>>>> -                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fZeroWidth = 0;
>>>> +                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fClusterStart = TRUE;
>>>> +                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fDiacritic = FALSE;
>>>> +                pGlyphProp[i].sva.fZeroWidth = FALSE;
>>>>                    break;
>>>
>>> I think it's a wrong change.Even if msdn says you can use TRUE/FALSE
>>> here,
>>
>> MSDN says explicitly the possible values *are* TRUE and FALSE
>>
>> (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd374046%28v=vs.85%29.aspx)...
>
> It says a lot of things.

Can you please elaborate?

E.g.

fDiacritic
    Value indicating if a glyph combines with base characters.
Possible values are defined in the following table.

    Value     Meaning
    TRUE    The glyph does combine with base characters.
    FALSE  The glyph does not combine with base characters.

I don't see how much clearer that could be...

Frédéric