Wine development questions

[Rui Caridade]

Hello,

Sorry if this was on the wrong list :)


Reverting it would break whatever that patch was supposed to fix.


Implementing the correct behaviour is not the best choice if the rest of
the structure suffers functional regressions due to it by not being
prepared. I know the 1.7.x versions are development releases but if
something is not done its go into the stable release.

This bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 and the latter fix.


2014-07-08 1:21 GMT+01:00 Vincent Povirk <madewokherd at gmail.com>:

> This would've been more appropriate on wine-users.
>
> > - If a patch/commit has a bad impact for users why not remove it,
> especially
> > if a possible solution is not accepted?
>
> Reverting it would break whatever that patch was supposed to fix.
>
> > -This summer sale i bought Tomb Raider 2013 on steam just to find the
> game
> > playable only with a patch on bugzilla. Is it only a case of the patch
> not
> > having come through the correct channels.Can it be accepted ? Its not a
> > single case.
>
> Which bug and patch are you referring to?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20140708/f48786ee/attachment.html>