[PATCH] vbscript: Implemented IsNumeric

Shuai Meng mengshuaicalendr at gmail.com
Sun Jul 20 20:23:19 CDT 2014


Thanks very much for commenting~


2014-07-19 0:22 GMT+08:00 Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com>:

> Hi Shuai,
>
> A few comments:
>
> - We probably should propagate unrelated errors. So if FAILED(hres) &&
> hres != DISP_E_TYPEMISMATCH, we should return hres
>
>     if(FAILED(hres))
>         return return_bool(res, FALSE);
>     else
>         return return_bool(res, TRUE);
>
> Why not:
>     return return_bool(res, SUCCEEDED(hres))
>
> static HRESULT return_bool(VARIANT *res, BOOL val)
> {
>     if(res) {
>         V_VT(res) = VT_BOOL;
>         V_BOOL(res) = val;
>     }
>     return S_OK;
> }
>
> VARIANT_BOOL uses VARIANT_TRUE/VARIANT_FALSE values, so this should be:
> V_BOOL(res) = val ? VARIANT_TRUE : VARIANT_FALSE;
>
> Cheers,
> Jacek
>
>
>
> On 07/18/14 17:29, Shuai Meng wrote:
> > Thanks all for commenting, I changed the implementation and put the
> > codes
> > here:
> https://github.com/Shuai-Meng/wine/commit/bb212763ffd639a238b5a47f2c6a27047a79fdc5
> >
> > It passed on both winxp and wine. But this patch still needs your
> > comments.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-18 17:30 GMT+08:00 Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com
> > <mailto:jacek at codeweavers.com>>:
> >
> >     On 07/18/14 04:11, Shuai Meng wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     2014-07-17 11:11 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry at baikal.ru
> >>     <mailto:dmitry at baikal.ru>>:
> >>
> >>         Shuai Meng <mengshuaicalendr at gmail.com
> >>         <mailto:mengshuaicalendr at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         > +        switch(V_VT(arg)) {
> >>         > +        case VT_UI1:
> >>         > +        case VT_I2:
> >>         > +        case VT_I4:
> >>         > +        case VT_I8:
> >>         > +        case VT_R4:
> >>         > +        case VT_R8:
> >>         > +        case VT_BOOL:
> >>         > +        case VT_EMPTY:
> >>         > +        case VT_CY:
> >>         > +            V_BOOL(res) = VARIANT_TRUE;
> >>         > +            break;
> >>
> >>         This list is far from being complete. It seems that it should
> >>         also
> >>         contain at least VT_UI2, VT_UI4, VT_UI8, VT_I1, VT_INT, VT_UINT.
> >>         VT_VECTOR, VT_ARRAY and VT_BYREF modifers probably also should
> be
> >>         taken into account.
> >>
> >>         --
> >>         Dmitry.
> >>
> >>     Hi, I think over it again. Let's face the fact: what are all the
> >>     possible results of  switch(V_VT(arg)) ? Will VT_UI2, VT_UI4,
> >>     VT_UI8, VT_I1, VT_INT, VT_UINT and so on exist? My answer is no.
> >>     arg comes from users' input, which means it only belongs to the
> >>      subtypes of variant, see here:
> >>     http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9e7a57cf(v=vs.84).aspx
> >>     <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9e7a57cf%28v=vs.84%29.aspx
> >
> >
> >     No, your answer is wrong. VBScript code may be called from
> >     non-VBScript (and the other way around) and then any type of
> >     VARIANT may be passed around. Also, please add a test with an
> >     object having default value, which is of numeric type. I have a
> >     feeling that the right thing to do here is to call to_double and
> >     see if it fails or not, but this needs tests to confirm.
> >
> >     Jacek
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20140721/980d29fd/attachment.html>


More information about the wine-devel mailing list