[PATCH v2] loader: check return values of wld_mprotect and wld_mmap calls
Paul Gofman
gofmanp at gmail.com
Tue Dec 22 10:05:19 CST 2015
On 12/22/2015 06:48 PM, Sebastian Lackner wrote:
>
> Trying different optimization flags is one possibility. Alternatively, you could
> also try to remove static/inline or adding __volatile__ to the assembler code.
__volatile__ is already there. There is also a "memory" modifier in
wld_mmap, and it is missing in wld_mprotect (docs suggest it is the
direct hint for the compiler not to optimize out asm code). But
unfortunately adding it to wld_mprotect does not solve the issue. I will
play more with it and with the other options you suggest.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list