An issue with msvcp110 test's design

[André Hentschel]

Am 15.03.2015 um 09:50 schrieb YongHao Hu:
> Hi, all
> Thanks for Piotr's comment on my GSOC ideas.
> In order to have a good knowledge of functions from tr2 namespace, I had made a test and written some functions' implementation.
> 
> However, I had an issue with msvcp test's design when I need to free library of msvcp90 and load msvcp110.
> 619 static HMODULE msvcr, msvcp;
>  620 #define SETNOFAIL(x,y) x = (void*)GetProcAddress(msvcp,y)
>  621 #define SET(x,y) do { SETNOFAIL(x,y); ok(x != NULL, "Export '%s' not found\     n", y); } while(0)
> In my patch, I use a hmodule variable named msvcp90 to save msvcp90 hmodule and then reuse msvcp to save msvcp110.
> As far as I am concerned, the name msvcp90 or msvcp90_saver is not good enough. Could you give it a good name?

Hi,
i'd simply add variables named e.g. msvcp110

> And the other method I came up with is  undefining SETNOFAIL and SET and using msvcp110 to define it again, which I think is ugly.
> By the way, my crosstest on all the testbots[1] show that msvcp110.dll or msvcrt110.dll not installed.
> It seems testbot doesn't install msvcp110.

Are you sure about msvcrt110 or do you mean msvcr110 (notice the t)