user32: After handling an internal message give a chance to real message to arrive.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:

> >> If you can avoid internal messages that's certainly good, but yes, I'd
> >> like to see more tests. In particular, for SetWindowPos you'd want to
> >> test using separate thread inputs, and how that work with changing the
> >> active window etc. Also SWP_ASYNCWINDOWPOS should be tested, from the
> >> docs it sounds very much like it needs an internal message.
> >
> > It would be helpful to clarify status of the already sent patches first,
> > after that I'll see waht could be done next.
> 
> I'm hoping you can consolidate this into a single series of tests that
> focuses on the problematic area.

Already sent tests already do test the cases which I consider as a most
likely source of the problem. There is no other theories on my part so
far, there is nothing to consolidate.

-- 
Dmitry.