[PATCH 04/10] ucrtbase: Handle the swprintf style termination and return values

[Alexandre Julliard]

Piotr Caban <piotr.caban at gmail.com> writes:
> On 11/02/15 13:45, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> After thinking another few minutes about it - sure, this is fine for me.
>> Should I resend the full patchset, or only 4->10 (at least some of them
>> will need some conflict resolution)? If I resend the full patchset, I
>> guess I can fold in your sign-offs in 1-3 (as long as I don't modify
>> those patches)?
> I can sign the patches after you resend them myself (I don't know
> what's the policy in this case).

I prefer if you sign them again after a resend, if it's folded into the
patch email I won't notice it right away. But if the already signed off
patches are still valid, it's even better to wait for me to commit them,
and then resend only the remaining ones.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org