[PATCH 04/10] ucrtbase: Handle the swprintf style termination and return values

Martin Storsjö martin at martin.st
Mon Nov 2 08:33:13 CST 2015

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Alexandre Julliard wrote:

> Piotr Caban <piotr.caban at gmail.com> writes:
>> On 11/02/15 13:45, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>> After thinking another few minutes about it - sure, this is fine for me.
>>> Should I resend the full patchset, or only 4->10 (at least some of them
>>> will need some conflict resolution)? If I resend the full patchset, I
>>> guess I can fold in your sign-offs in 1-3 (as long as I don't modify
>>> those patches)?
>> I can sign the patches after you resend them myself (I don't know
>> what's the policy in this case).
> I prefer if you sign them again after a resend, if it's folded into the
> patch email I won't notice it right away. But if the already signed off
> patches are still valid, it's even better to wait for me to commit them,
> and then resend only the remaining ones.

They are still valid, so I'll resend the rest of the branch later after 
today's push.

// Martin

More information about the wine-devel mailing list