[PATCH v2 4/7] ucrtbase: Implement the new printf corner case behaviour
piotr.caban at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 03:46:56 CST 2015
On 11/03/15 10:40, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Piotr Caban wrote:
>> On 11/02/15 22:26, Martin Storsjo wrote:
>>> - if (options & ~UCRTBASE_PRINTF_TERMINATION_MASK)
>>> - FIXME("options %s not handled\n",
>> Shouldn't this be changed to:
>> if(options & ~UCRTBASE_PRINTF_MASK)
>> instead of being removed?
> Perhaps, although these are all the flags that are currently defined, so
> as far as I can see, there's nothing left to warn about (unless someone
> calls this internal function deliberately with weird/undefined flags).
> (The mask when caling pf_printf is only to make sure that we don't
> accidentally alias the flags of our own.)
> Should we keep a warning in case a future version adds more flags?
Yes, please add a warning.
More information about the wine-devel