[PATCH] user32: Allow WM_CAPTURECHANGE indicating SetCapture() parameter.
dmitry at baikal.ru
Mon Nov 23 21:40:55 CST 2015
Christopher Thielen <cthielen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hm. If I don't specify '|lparam', won't it avoid checking the lParam
> It's not that I'm working around the lParam check, it's that I
> specifically _want_ the lParam check to ensure its value equals hWnd.
> That's the behavior for which I'm hoping to prevent a regression.
> Without the patch, Wine sets the lParam to the wrong value.
> So, should I keep it how it is then minus the comment syntax? Or perhaps
> move the sequence into being simple variable within the function as
> setting a value in a potentially shared struct is a bit awkward?
Isn't the original problem that you are trying to solve about Wine not
sending WM_CAPTURECHANGED message at all?
More information about the wine-devel