Migrating away from Sourceforge

Aaryaman Vasishta jem456.vasishta at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 02:22:27 CDT 2015


+1. That's great news :D
It would be a great silver lining if the bandwidth does get over once we
start providing binary packages ;)

Cheers,
Aaryaman

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy White <jwhite at codeweavers.com>
> wrote:
> >>> As an update, I did email the Conservancy.  They've gotten this same
> >> question from a number of member projects, and are doing some
> >> research/thinking about this.
> >>>
> >>> So it's not forgotten, but in progress.
> >
> > Just in case folks have missed it, we are getting sponsorship from
> > Fastly.  Jeremy Newman is working out the details now.
> >
> > It's not clear how much bandwidth we'll need vs how much they are
> > donating.  It looks like we'll be getting at least 8.5 TB/month, which
> > should be enough to cover the move away from Sourceforge.
> >
> > But we were also hoping to provide binary downloads; we may need to do
> > some wiggling to cover that as well.  Of course, that depends on how
> > much demand there is for the binary downloads; if the demand is modest,
> > it won't be an issue.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jeremy
>
> Huzzah! Thanks Jeremy.
>
> --
> -Austin
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20150929/6a701e3a/attachment.html>


More information about the wine-devel mailing list