[PATCH 3/5] user32: Don't enable owner in DIALOG_DoDialogBox.

Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers.com
Wed Apr 6 08:24:38 CDT 2016

On 04/06/16 15:04, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> --- a/dlls/user32/controls.h
>> +++ b/dlls/user32/controls.h
>> @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ typedef struct tagDIALOGINFO
>>  #define DF_END  0x0001
>> -#define DF_OWNERENABLED 0x0002
> As I already mentioned during our conversation in wine-devel my (not yet
> submitted) tests show that completely removing DF_OWNERENABLED handling
> is wrong.

Well, you mentioned it in context of your patches where you remove it
and always enable owner. I agree that's wrong, my tests show that. I
remove it in a different way. Could you share those tests (WIP is fine)
or run my patches against them?

> And once again I'd like to see the tests submitted first with todo_wine
> statements in appropriate places, and the patches sent only after that
> with separate fixes for every failure found by the tests. Sending a bunch
> of tests as the final patch doesn't show what didn't actually work before,
> and what exactly has been fixed by the patch series.

Not really, those tests heavily depend on WM_ENTERIDLE being sent to the
right window. Otherwise tests would hang so todo_wine won't help much.


More information about the wine-devel mailing list