Wine's forked version of fontforge

Jens Reyer jre.winesim at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 12:14:22 CDT 2016


On 30.04.2016 04:13, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 04/22/2016 12:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Jens Reyer <jre.winesim at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Wine and Debian are both using the quite old fontforge version
>>> 20120731-b, the patches apply cleanly in Debian.
>>> But upstream is actively developing and in Debian someone is working on
>>> packaging a recent version (not sure with what outcome, e.g. afaik there
>>> is at least one upstream regression blocking an update).
>>> Are there any plans in Wine to update to a newer version?
>>
>> No plans currently, but I can certainly look into it if it helps.
> 
> Thanks. First off, I successfully tested the current fontforge 
> 20160404. I built Wine and the .ttf files with it, and verified in one 
> app that relies on them that they are working. So no immediate need to
> update, but it might be a good idea generally.
> 
> After looking into your patches and explanation my understanding is
> that we may regenerate the .ttf files in Debian without having to 
> worry about the results. However for contributing to Wine the current 
> Debian fontforge is not suitable. So I started trying to get your 
> changes applied upstream:
> 
>>> 1. Various hacks to avoid putting timestamps in generated files (AJ).
> 
> Created issue https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2711
> The timestamps are also a hindrance for reproducible builds, and need 
> to be tackled somehow in fontforge anyway.

fyi, fontforge upstream is currently discussing this issue.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list