[v2] preloader: Allow a debugger to find ld.so's rendezvous-struct

[Keno Fischer]

Monthly bump on "Where'd my patch go?"

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com> wrote:
> Bump on the question of what happened to this patch.
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com> wrote:
>> I had submitted v3 of this patch, but I don't see it on
>> https://source.winehq.org/patches/ anymore. Was there some review comments I
>> missed somewhere?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, that can probably be done with some linker script magic, since
>>> this is merely a warning in the assembler. I'll take a look at that.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com> writes:
>>> >
>>> >> Whether .dynamic is writable depends on the architecture (I believe
>>> >> the only one on which it isn't is MIPS, but I could be wrong about
>>> >> that). Looks like binutils doesn't take that into account when issuing
>>> >> this diagnostic in the assembler and expects .dynamic to have
>>> >> SHF_ALLOC only. Probably something to complain about to them. I don't
>>> >> believe there's an actual problem though, just an incorrect
>>> >> diagnostic.
>>> >
>>> > We don't want to introduce build warnings though, so even if this is a
>>> > binutils bug it would have to be avoided somehow.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Alexandre Julliard
>>> > julliard at winehq.org
>>
>>