ddraw/tests: Fix function name in multiple ok() messages. (resend)

[Sebastian Lackner]

On 15.03.2016 15:20, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On 7 March 2016 at 08:40, Sebastian Lackner <sebastian at fds-team.de> wrote:
>>> I assume this patch was missed somehow, resending.
>>>
>> No, the patch is just not very useful.
> 
> FWIW I asked Henri for clarification, and he said that the ddraw tests
> should be ported to ddraw[1247] so it's better to avoid changing them
> until that's completed.
> 

Unless Henri already has prepared patches which would not apply anymore, that
does not really explain to me why such a trivial typo fix is rejected. It's
better to fix typos before the code is duplicated in multiple tests, isn't it?