[v2] preloader: Allow a debugger to find ld.so's rendezvous-struct

[Keno Fischer]

Bump on the question of what happened to this patch.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com> wrote:
> I had submitted v3 of this patch, but I don't see it on
> https://source.winehq.org/patches/ anymore. Was there some review comments I
> missed somewhere?
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, that can probably be done with some linker script magic, since
>> this is merely a warning in the assembler. I'll take a look at that.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> Whether .dynamic is writable depends on the architecture (I believe
>> >> the only one on which it isn't is MIPS, but I could be wrong about
>> >> that). Looks like binutils doesn't take that into account when issuing
>> >> this diagnostic in the assembler and expects .dynamic to have
>> >> SHF_ALLOC only. Probably something to complain about to them. I don't
>> >> believe there's an actual problem though, just an incorrect
>> >> diagnostic.
>> >
>> > We don't want to introduce build warnings though, so even if this is a
>> > binutils bug it would have to be avoided somehow.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alexandre Julliard
>> > julliard at winehq.org
>
>