[PATCH 1/2] user32/tests: Test DialogBoxParam using a dialog template with invalid control class.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Andrew Eikum <aeikum at codeweavers.com> wrote:

> > > > > Again, I asked Sebastian to send it on your behalf, precisely to avoid
> > > > > this argument. He told me to send it instead, so I did.
> > > > 
> > > > I'd appreciate if you could avoid sending my patches without my permission
> > > > in future. Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > If you don't want your code used under the terms of the LGPL then I
> > > suggest you stop releasing code under the terms of the LGPL.
> > 
> > Once again: it's not about licensing, it's about respect. You had
> > admitted in the private e-mail (when you asked about permission
> > to send my patches) that you are not familiar with that code, and
> > asked for my opinion. But once you've received my response you
> > decided to ignore my opinion. So, you took my patches that you have
> > no idea what are doing and sent to wine-patches with your own sign-off
> > pretending that you had reviewed the patch. That's at least pretty
> > rude and ridiculous behaviour, isn't it?
> > 
> 
> No. If you don't want to participate in the wine-staging process, you
> should stop contributing to wine-staging.

Please don't try to pretend that you are participating in some process,
especially when you clearly have no idea what's that. What you are doing
is stealing the work done by somebody else, admitting at the same time
that you are not familar with that code.

-- 
Dmitry.