[PATCH v4 09/17] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero

Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri-calderon at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 23 00:36:58 CST 2017


Section 2.2.1.3 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when the mod part of the ModRM
byte is zero and R/EBP is specified in the R/M part of such bit, the value
of the aforementioned register should not be used in the address
computation. Instead, a 32-bit displacement is expected. The instruction
decoder takes care of setting the displacement to the expected value.
Returning -EDOM signals callers that they should ignore the value of such
register when computing the address encoded in the instruction operands.

Also, callers should exercise care to correctly interpret this particular
case. In IA-32e 64-bit mode, the address is given by the displacement plus
the value of the RIP. In IA-32e compatibility mode, the value of EIP is
ignored. This correction is done for our insn_get_addr_ref.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder at gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes at gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren at intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar at intel.com>
Cc: x86 at kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon at linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 3fe4ddb..d6525c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -218,6 +218,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	switch (type) {
 	case REG_TYPE_RM:
 		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);
+		/* if mod=0, register R/EBP is not used in the address
+		 * computation. Instead, a 32-bit displacement is expected;
+		 * the instruction decoder takes care of reading such
+		 * displacement. This is true for both R/EBP and R13, as the
+		 * REX.B bit is not decoded.
+		 */
+		if (regno == 5 && X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 0)
+			return -EDOM;
 		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
@@ -544,10 +552,29 @@ static void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 			addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
 		} else {
+			unsigned char addr_bytes;
+
+			addr_bytes = insn_get_seg_default_address_bytes(regs);
 			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-			if (addr_offset < 0)
-				goto out_err;
-			addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			if (addr_offset < 0) {
+				/* -EDOM means that we must ignore the
+				 * address_offset. The only case in which we
+				 * see this value is when R/M points to R/EBP.
+				 * In such a case, the address involves using
+				 * the instruction pointer for 64-bit mode.
+				 */
+				if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
+					/* if in 64-bit mode */
+					if (addr_bytes == 8)
+						addr = regs->ip;
+					else
+						addr = 0;
+				} else {
+					goto out_err;
+				}
+			} else {
+				addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			}
 		}
 		addr += insn->displacement.value;
 	}
-- 
2.9.3




More information about the wine-devel mailing list