[PATCH v7 04/26] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b

[Ricardo Neri]

Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod !=11b and
ModRM.rm = 100b indexed register-indirect addressing is used. In other
words, a SIB byte follows the ModRM byte. In the specific case of
SIB.index = 100b, the scale*index portion of the computation of the
effective address is null. To signal callers of this particular situation,
get_reg_offset() can return -EDOM (-EINVAL continues to indicate that an
error when decoding the SIB byte).

An example of this situation can be the following instruction:

   8b 4c 23 80       mov -0x80(%rbx,%riz,1),%rcx
   ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
   SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][index:100b][base:11b]
   Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)

The %riz 'register' indicates a null index.

In long mode, a REX prefix may be used. When a REX prefix is present,
REX.X adds a fourth bit to the register selection of SIB.index. This gives
the ability to refer to all the 16 general purpose registers. When REX.X is
1b and SIB.index is 100b, the index is indicated in %r12. In our example,
this would look like:

   42 8b 4c 23 80    mov -0x80(%rbx,%r12,1),%rcx
   REX:              0x42 [W:0b][R:0b][X:1b][B:0b]
   ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
   SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][.X: 1b, index:100b][.B:0b, base:11b]
   Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder at gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes at gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren at intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Nathan Howard <liverlint at gmail.com>
Cc: Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn at gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar at intel.com>
Cc: x86 at kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon at linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
index ebdead8..7397b81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -110,6 +110,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		regno = X86_SIB_INDEX(insn->sib.value);
 		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
+		/*
+		 * If ModRM.mod !=3 and SIB.index (regno=4) the scale*index
+		 * portion of the address computation is null. This is
+		 * true only if REX.X is 0. In such a case, the SIB index
+		 * is used in the address computation.
+		 */
+		if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) != 3 && regno == 4)
+			return -EDOM;
 		break;
 
 	case REG_TYPE_BASE:
@@ -159,11 +167,19 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 				goto out_err;
 
 			indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
-			if (indx_offset < 0)
+			/*
+			 * A negative offset generally means a error, except
+			 * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register
+			 * should not be used as index.
+			 */
+			if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
+				indx = 0;
+			else if (indx_offset < 0)
 				goto out_err;
+			else
+				indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
 
 			base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
-			indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
 			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
 		} else {
 			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-- 
2.9.3