[PATCH 1/4] gdiplus/metafile: Support hatch brushes in playback

[Nikolay Sivov]

On 01.11.2017 21:46, Vincent Povirk wrote:
>> Sure. You think it's better to have a single ARGB field, or a union to
>> make components accessible too?
> 
> I don't see a need to make components accessible. Now that I'm
> thinking about it, I don't think we need an EmfPlusARGB typedef at
> all.
> 

Possible reason is to have other structures definitions closer to what
specification says. I'd prefer typedef to ARGB as opposed to no separate
type, but I don't care all that much and can remove it.