[PATCH] msvcp120: Fix _Xtime_diff_to_millis2 overflow behavior.

[Piotr Caban]

On 10/17/17 16:58, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 2017-10-13 um 09:46 schrieb Piotr Caban:
>>>> It looks like the function should be treating negative time differences
>>>> in special way. Except of that it seems to be ignoring overflows. I
>>>> think that following code is much easier to read. Is something like this
>>>> working for you?
>>> Your code looks more elegant than mine for sure, and I believe it should
>>> work. I'll double check it with WGC to be on the safe side.
> Your patch works for my tests and WGC. You forgot to define
> NANOSEC_PER_SEC though.
> 
> I'd propose that you send your patch and I'll resubmit my tests with the
> LONGLONG constant fix. Does that work for you?
Yes, I've sent the patch.

Thanks,
Piotr