[PATCH 1/2] include: Add IADsADSystemInfo definition.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry at baikal.ru> wrote:

> Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +interface IADsADSystemInfo : IDispatch
> > > +{
> ...
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +[
> > > +    helpstring("AD SystemInfo Object"),
> > > +    uuid(50b6327f-afd1-11d2-9cb9-0000f87a369e),
> > > +    threading(both)
> > > +]
> > > +coclass ADSystemInfo
> > > +{
> > > +    [default] interface IADsADSystemInfo;
> > > +    interface IDispatch;
> > > +}
> > 
> > Aren't these supposed to be defined inside the activeds typelib instead?
> 
> PSDK defines IADsADSystemInfo and ADSystemInfo in iads.h which is
> a generated header (supposedly from iads.idl, where I put these
> definitions as well). On the other hand activeds.tlb contains much
> more interfaces and definitions than iads.h does, so I'd guess that
> activeds.tlb is generated from an .idl that includes most of active
> directory related .idl files.

Is there anything else that prevents accepting these two patches?
Or perhaps add some underscores to typedefs to make the patches
more appealing? It looks like they are no longer frowned upon
these days? :)

-- 
Dmitry.