[PATCH v2] kernel32: Implement FindNLSStringEx. Tests included.
huw at codeweavers.com
Mon Mar 12 10:57:15 CDT 2018
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:52:17AM -0500, Sergio Gómez Del Real wrote:
> I'm not really sure what assumptions I can make to avoid an o(n.m), since both
> of the strings can be presented with characters in any (pre)composed form... I
> don't know if the trouble trying to find a way to upper-bound the search with a
> length (3x? 5x?) would be worth considering that it seems to be the normal case
> that we don't get too long strings to compare, and relatively little use of the
> function itself. Would brute-force o(n.m) be too bad?
Just send in v2 of the patch with the changes I suggested.
Normalization needs to be implemented before we need to worry about
any of this.
More information about the wine-devel