[PATCH 1/8] wsdapi: Use slim reader/writer lock instead of critical section.
Zebediah Figura
z.figura12 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 09:24:20 CDT 2018
On 13/09/18 03:44, Owen Rudge wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Owen Rudge <orudge at codeweavers.com>
> ---
> dlls/wsdapi/discovery.c | 13 ++++++-------
> dlls/wsdapi/network.c | 4 ++--
> dlls/wsdapi/wsdapi_internal.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>
>
>
>
I haven't looked at the rest of the series, but is this functionally
necessary? Given that SRW locks will provide worse performance on Wine
than critical sections. Although I think SRW locks can be made to use
futexes internally too...
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list