[PATCH 1/2] server: Add default security descriptor ownership for processes.

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
>
> "Erich E. Hoover" <erich.e.hoover at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest at gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > +static struct security_descriptor *process_get_sd( struct object *obj )
> >> > +{
> >> > +    static struct security_descriptor *key_default_sd;
> >> > +
> >> > +    if (obj->sd) return obj->sd;
> >> > +
> >> > +    if (!key_default_sd)
> >> > +    {
> >> > +        size_t users_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_domain_users_sid );
> >> > +        size_t admins_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_builtin_admins_sid );
> >> > +
> >> > +        key_default_sd = mem_alloc( sizeof(*key_default_sd) + admins_sid_len + users_sid_len  );
> >> > +        key_default_sd->control   = SE_DACL_PRESENT;
> >> > +        key_default_sd->owner_len = admins_sid_len;
> >> > +        key_default_sd->group_len = users_sid_len;
> >> > +        key_default_sd->sacl_len  = 0;
> >> > +        key_default_sd->dacl_len  = 0;
> >> > +        memcpy( key_default_sd + 1, security_builtin_admins_sid, admins_sid_len );
> >> > +        memcpy( (char *)(key_default_sd + 1) + admins_sid_len, security_domain_users_sid, users_sid_len );
> >> > +    }
> >> > +    return key_default_sd;
> >>
> >> key_default_sd is clearly not the appropriate name here.
> >
> > Sorry about that, I clearly started with the registry example
> > (key_get_sd).  Would you prefer process_default_sd or just default_sd?
>
> Either is fine.
+1 for process_default_sd
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> julliard at winehq.org