[PATCH v2 3/8] ntdll/tests: Make the zero_bits parameter explicit in all tests

Rémi Bernon rbernon at codeweavers.com
Mon Jun 17 04:49:59 CDT 2019


On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 10:45 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:11:12PM +0200, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>
> > ---
> >  dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > ----
> >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c
> > b/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c
> > index 26d058185fd..2a71a561a90 100644
> > --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c
> > +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c
> > @@ -39,21 +39,24 @@ static void test_AllocateVirtualMemory(void)
> >      /* simple allocation should success */
> >      size = 0x1000;
> >      addr1 = NULL;
> > -    status = NtAllocateVirtualMemory(NtCurrentProcess(), &addr1,
> > 0, &size,
> > +    zero_bits = 0;
> > +    status = NtAllocateVirtualMemory(NtCurrentProcess(), &addr1,
> > zero_bits, &size,
> >                                       MEM_RESERVE | MEM_COMMIT,
> > PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE);
> 
> Does this really make things better?  If you follow this logic
> through you'll be
> creating a variable for every parameter and initialising it before
> each call.
> 
> Huw.

There was one tests where a value was passed to the function and then
the address result was checked using the local variable. I just wanted
to avoid this kind of typo.
-- 
Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>




More information about the wine-devel mailing list