[PATCH 5/8] server: Notify client about freed object so that it may free associated kernel object.

[Derek Lesho]

I am also curious about something, what was wrong w/ the old
infrastructure where the object structure held the list to
kernel_objects?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:51 PM Zebediah Figura <z.figura12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2019 09:58 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> >
> > Long term, we may consider making interface between server and device
> > manager more generic so that it could be used for messages other than IRPs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com>
> > ---
> >  dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  server/device.c              | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  server/protocol.def          |  6 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Sorry if this is a dumb question, but why do we need this (and then, by
> extension, the whole infrastructure involving server changes)?
>
>