[PATCH v4 2/6] kernel32/tests: Add NtAllocateVirtualMemory tests for zero_bits behavior

Huw Davies huw at codeweavers.com
Wed May 29 04:42:37 CDT 2019


On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> The zero_bits parameter doesn't behave as expected, and some 64bit code
> use it to allocate memory in the lower 32bit address space.
> 
> The expected full behaviour is:
> 
> * zero_bits == 0: no constraint on address range
> * 0 < zero_bits <= 15: returned address should have as many upper bits
>                        set to 0, starting at bit 31. In 64bit mode,
>                        upper 32bits should all be 0 as well.
> * 15 < zero_bits <= 31: unsure, but probably same as zero_bits == 15.
> * zero_bits > 31: (64bit/WoW64 only) zero_bits behaves as a bitmask, as
>                   if it was set to the number of leading 0 in the
>                   bitmask, works in the whole 64bit range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>
> ---
>  dlls/kernel32/tests/virtual.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/virtual.c b/dlls/kernel32/tests/virtual.c
> index dcaeb147b04..1778509d2ac 100644
> --- a/dlls/kernel32/tests/virtual.c
> +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/virtual.c
> @@ -228,10 +228,12 @@ static void test_VirtualAllocEx(void)
>  static void test_VirtualAlloc(void)
>  {
>      void *addr1, *addr2;
> +    ULONG zero_bits;
>      DWORD old_prot;
>      MEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION info;
>      NTSTATUS status;
>      SIZE_T size;
> +    BOOL is_wow64;
>  
>      SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
>      addr1 = VirtualAlloc(0, 0, MEM_RESERVE, PAGE_NOACCESS);
> @@ -461,13 +463,16 @@ static void test_VirtualAlloc(void)
>          ok(status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "pNtFreeVirtualMemory return %08x, addr2: %p\n", status, addr2);
>      }
>  
> -    /* 21 zero bits is valid */
> +    /* 1 zero bits should zero 63-31 upper bits */
>      size = 0x1000;
>      addr2 = NULL;
> -    status = pNtAllocateVirtualMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), &addr2, 21, &size,
> -                                      MEM_RESERVE | MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE);
> -    ok(status == STATUS_SUCCESS || status == STATUS_NO_MEMORY,
> -       "NtAllocateVirtualMemory returned %08x\n", status);
> +    zero_bits = 1;
> +    status = pNtAllocateVirtualMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), &addr2, 1, &size,
> +                                      MEM_RESERVE | MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_READWRITE);
> +    todo_wine
> +    ok((status == STATUS_SUCCESS || broken(status == STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_3) /* winxp */) &&
> +       ((UINT_PTR)addr2 >> (32 - zero_bits)) == 0,
> +       "NtAllocateVirtualMemory returned %08x, addr2: %p\n", status, addr2);
>      if (status == STATUS_SUCCESS)
>      {
>          size = 0;
> @@ -475,6 +480,23 @@ static void test_VirtualAlloc(void)
>          ok(status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "pNtFreeVirtualMemory return %08x, addr2: %p\n", status, addr2);
>      }
>  
> +    for (zero_bits = 2; zero_bits <= 21; zero_bits++)
> +    {
> +        size = 0x1000;
> +        addr2 = NULL;
> +        status = pNtAllocateVirtualMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), &addr2, zero_bits, &size,
> +                                          MEM_RESERVE | MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_READWRITE);
> +        todo_wine
> +        ok((status == STATUS_SUCCESS || status == STATUS_NO_MEMORY) && ((UINT_PTR)addr2 >> (32 - zero_bits)) == 0,
> +           "NtAllocateVirtualMemory with %d zero_bits returned %08x, addr2: %p\n", zero_bits, status, addr2);
> +        if (status == STATUS_SUCCESS)
> +        {
> +            size = 0;
> +            status = pNtFreeVirtualMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), &addr2, &size, MEM_RELEASE);
> +            ok(status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "pNtFreeVirtualMemory return %08x, addr2: %p\n", status, addr2);
> +        }
> +    }
> +

Problem is sometimes these actually work (and so fail the todo_wine):

virtual.c:473: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 2 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 3 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 4 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 5 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 6 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 7 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 8 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 9 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000
virtual.c:490: Test succeeded inside todo block: NtAllocateVirtualMemory with 10 zero_bits returned 00000000, addr2: 00222000

Also having these tests in kernel32 seems wrong; though short of
adding a new virtual.c to the ntdll tests, I couldn't find a sensible
place to put them.

Huw.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list