[PATCH 0/4] Update USER_SHARED_DATA timestamps more often.

Rémi Bernon rbernon at codeweavers.com
Fri Nov 29 04:47:30 CST 2019

On 11/29/19 11:40 AM, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> * Then according to [1], updating the timestamps continuously could 
> apparently break some copy-protection schemes (SecuROM for instance) 
> that measures the time taken by some syscalls. As Wine is not exactly 
> doing as Windows, the syscall timings could be larger and having the 
> timestamps not increase in this particular case allows us to pass these 
> checks.
> [1] https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-March/094788.html

My bad, it was SafeDisk, not SecuROM, as mentioned here: 
Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>

More information about the wine-devel mailing list