[PATCH] winmm: Default to 1ms resolution like we used to

[Rémi Bernon]

On 2020-08-15 09:39, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> 
> 
>> Am 15.08.2020 um 01:44 schrieb Myah Caron <qsniyg at protonmail.com>:
>>
>> Sorry I'm a bit new so I'm not quite sure what the rules are regarding TRACEs, but would adding a TRACE here be an issue? I think it might be helpful for future debugging if there are any other issues with it.
> 
> Those 'rules' are somewhat inconsistent. I would say adding a TRACE here is a good idea, but not strictly necessary.
> 
> A lot of functions in kernel32/kernelbase and ntdll have no TRACEs because they show up in a +relay log. But since I am used to COM interfaces in d3d which don't show up in relay logs (+relay injects code into DLL exports, and COM interfaces aren't PE exports) I am very used to +ddraw showing me all ddraw calls, so at times I am confused when +winmm doesn't show half the winmm calls.
> 

Also, +relay doesn't work with some DRMs, so IMHO adding TRACE messages 
is always useful unless there's a performance penalty or too much verbosity.

For instance I would say ntdll could use more TRACE but it may be 
subjective so I've always kept these patches local.
-- 
Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>